top of page
Writer's pictureILLIA PROKOPIEV

Digital Crossroads: Deciphering Data Flows and Trade Dynamics

As the world delves deeper into the digital era, it is paramount to be equipped with the understanding and knowledge of how cross-border data flows and digital trade play into the larger picture of international relations, commerce, and technology advancements.


Digital Economy's Lifeline: Cross-Border Data Flows


Significance:

  • It is crucial for the modern economy.

  • It supports financial transactions, communications, service access, efficient manufacturing, and medical research.

  • It is vital for the growth and implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) due to AI's reliance on vast data.

Landmark Trade Agreements:

  • United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)

  • Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

  • Rise of digital-specific trade agreements.

Objectives for the Future:

  • A continuous commitment to promote open data flows between nations.

  • Need for a balanced approach taking into account: privacy concerns, national security considerations, industrial policy.

Principle Guiding Data Flow: "Data Free Flow with Trust" (DFFT)


Aim: Encourage openness in cross-border data transfers between collaborating countries.

Challenges and Considerations:

  • Various stakeholders with diverse, sometimes conflicting, interests in data collection, storage, processing, and movement.

  • Not guaranteed that future rules will be identical to previous ones.

The Evolving Trade Environment


Changes and Challenges:

  • Impact of changes in US domestic politics.

  • Geopolitical tensions.

  • Increased focus on US-China relations.

  • Supply chain disruptions.

  • Rapid technological advancements, notably the significant rise of AI and its safety concerns.

Potential Consequences:

  • Adjustments in business strategies and trade flows.

  • Re-evaluation of regulatory approaches in weighing policy objectives and security against commerce and innovation barriers.

  • Possible slowdown in the development of trade disciplines or further segmentation of the global digital economy.

Barriers, Architecture, and Initiatives in the Digital Economy


Examination of:

  • The increasing barriers to cross-border data flows.

  • The existing global legal framework governing the digital economy, focusing on the World Trade Organization (WTO) and trade agreement disciplines related to such barriers.

Future Directions:

  • Exploration of upcoming digital trade initiatives.

  • Ongoing US endeavors to establish agreements that harmoniously balance digital trade facilitation, international data flow, and government regulation for public welfare.

Artificial Intelligence: The New Player in Trade

AI's Role:

  • Significantly reliant on vast datasets.

  • Highlights the gravity of data flow obligations within trade agreements.

  • Brings to light fresh regulatory questions.

  • AI's potentially pivotal role in upcoming negotiations on digital trade and data flows.

Why Data Matters to AI

Processing Needs:

  • Handling vast amounts of data for training and insights.

  • Direct link to rules governing cross-border data transfers.

  • AI leans heavily on cloud computing services and data collection from the Internet of Things (IoT).

Hardware Dependency: Advanced semiconductors are crucial for AI development and have recently come under trade policy scrutiny.


Potential Roadblocks to AI Progress

Data Transfer Restrictions: This can decelerate AI development by curbing access to essential training data and vital commercial services.


Cross-Border Data Advantages:

  • Ensures access to commercial services and international talent.

  • Cloud computing services: a crucial tool for training models, particularly benefiting smaller companies lacking the infrastructure for hardware development.

Emerging Concerns in the AI Landscape

Regulatory Gaps:

  • AI's rapid growth brings risks like AI weaponization, misinformation proliferation, surveillance, biases, intellectual property protection.

Regulators' Tightrope Walk:

  • Balancing industry needs with potential risks.

  • As they probe into areas like data gathering, algorithm development, and advanced semiconductor utilization, newly minted rules could affect cross-border data flows broadly.

AI's Evolving Regulatory Fabric

Emergent Frameworks:

  • AI Act in the EU.

  • Voluntary AI Commitments in the US.

The Challenge Ahead:

  • Striking a balance between industry openness and risk management.

  • The starting phase of international coordination.

Private Sector's Critical Role:

  • Input from key tech giants pivotal in shaping, operating, and upkeeping international legal structures governing cross-border data flows.

Forms of Data Localization Measures:

Data Localization: A favored tactic employed by multiple governments.

  • Data Mirroring: Necessitating companies to retain copies of specific data domestically before an external transfer.

  • Local Data Storage Rules: Mandating firms to house data within the originating country's confines.

  • "De facto" Local Storage: Firms opt to localize data storage due to the stringent norms on data export.

  • Selective Data Transfer Restrictions: Limiting data export to nations recognized for adequate data protection.

  • Total Data Transfer Bans: Complete restriction on transferring certain datasets to foreign territories.

  • Regulatory Mandates: Using mechanisms like licensing and certification to enforce local data storage and prevent foreign entities from handling and processing data.

Other Prevalent Digital Trade Barriers:

  • Digital Service Restrictions: Constraints on offering digitally-enabled services.

  • Governmental Data Access: Compulsory access to data for authorities.

  • Confining Tech Specifications: Imposing requirements like revealing software source code and algorithms.

Governments' Rationale for Digital Trade Impediments:

  • Privacy and data protection.

  • Intellectual property rights defense.

  • Regulatory oversight or auditing aims.

  • National security considerations.

  • On the flip side, in certain scenarios, these measures reek of sheer protectionism or ambitions to foster domestic frontrunners in a specific domain.

  • The standing viewpoint of consecutive US governments indicates skepticism towards regulations devoid of genuine public policy rationale. They identify such rules as potential threats to the modern economy's growth, advocating for trade disciplines that deter such obstructions.

WTO's Legacy and Adaptation to the Digital Age


Historical Context:

  • Cross-border data flows have exponentially grown since the inception of WTO agreements in 1995.

  • Original WTO agreements did not specifically address emerging issues like data flows and localization.

Relevance to the GATS:

  • The growth in global data flows mainly ties to the digital delivery of services.

  • The WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) possesses certain provisions related to measures that limit cross-border data flows, especially when these affect trade in services.

Dissecting GATS Commitments:

Market Access & National Treatment:

  • GATS obligations vary; specific commitments are accorded only in committed service sectors.

  • Each member outlines its commitments in its Schedule of Specific Commitments.

Implications:

  • Commitments can restrict data localization requirements.

  • GATS is technologically neutral, meaning commitments apply regardless of how the service is provided.

  • Restrictions on essential data for service provision could violate GATS commitments.

GATS Exceptions:

  • General exceptions in Article XIV: protecting public order and morals; preserving human, animal, or plant life; ensuring compliance with consistent laws, including fraud prevention and privacy.

  • Security exception in Article XIV bis allows actions deemed necessary for protecting essential security interests.

GATS Limitations:

  • Focused mainly on services.

  • Sector-specific nature of commitments.

  • Evolving technology and regulation prompt the need for comprehensive rules.

Moratorium on Customs Duties on Electronic Transmissions:

  • Established in 1998, this moratorium prevents WTO members from imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions.

  • Extended biennially, with the recent extension lasting until March 31, 2024.

  • Some nations express concerns over potential revenue losses and the inability to protect domestic industries.

The Pioneering Impact of Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

  • Introduced significant disciplines like data localization, cross-border data flows, and technology transfer, revising older e-commerce disciplines.

  • After the US's withdrawal in 2017, the agreement transformed into the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), with countries like the UK joining in 2023.

Key Provisions in Modern Trade Agreements


Duties on Electronic Transmissions:

  • Permanent prohibition of customs duties on "electronic transmissions" among the CPTPP Parties.

  • While the CPTPP extends this to all electronic content, others like the USMCA target only "digital products" for commercial sale.

Cross-Border Data Flows:

  • The CPTPP ensures businesses can transfer data, including personal information, across borders.

  • USMCA and US-Japan DTA have tighter provisions, preventing "prohibition or restriction" of data flows.

Data Localization Measures:

  • CPTPP restricts businesses from being forced to locate computing facilities within a Party's territory.

  • USMCA and US-Japan DTA exclude exceptions for "legitimate public policy objective," but they have broader scopes.

Protection Against Forced Source Code Disclosure:

  • The CPTPP safeguards against mandatory transfer or access to software's source code during import or use in a member country.

  • USMCA and US-Japan DTA expand this provision to all software, incorporating algorithm protection.

The Anticipated Impact and Challenges:

  • Unclear definitions in security exceptions could be potential roadblocks in maintaining uninterrupted data flows.

  • With the provisions and exceptions being untested in dispute settlements, their practical effectiveness remains a pivotal concern.

Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF)

  • Originated in May 2022 between the United States and other Indo-Pacific nations.

  • It is not a traditional trade agreement; it omits market access coverage for goods or services.

  • Main digital trade objectives encompass:

    • Creating a trusted digital economy environment.

    • Amplifying access to online information and services.

    • Facilitating and ensuring fairness in digital trade.

    • Enhancing the resilience and security of digital platforms.

  • Full agreement aimed to conclude by November 2023.

US-Taiwan Initiative

  • Initiated in August 2022, not a comprehensive FTA.

  • Focuses on digital trade, aiming to:

    • Build consumer trust in the digital ecosystem.

    • Enhance digital technology utilization.

    • Combat discriminatory practices in the digital space.

  • Negotiations planned in stages; first phase sealed on June 1, 2023.

EU's Stance on Digital Trade

  • Modernized approach with a broader focus beyond e-commerce.

  • EU’s digital trade chapter features in new agreements like those with New Zealand, Chile, and the UK.

  • Emphasis on harmonizing the EU model with the CPTPP approach in the Asia-Pacific.

Privacy Meets Trade: EU Data Privacy Law

  • EU’s GDPR mandates stringent data privacy, often causing cross-border data flow challenges.

  • The new EU-US Data Privacy Framework (July 2023) aims to reconcile differing data privacy strategies, ensuring data flow amidst ensuring privacy.

Asia-Pacific Momentum on Digital Trade

  • Significant developments include the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) - an evolving digital era agreement.

  • DEPA, signed by Singapore, Chile, New Zealand in 2020, focuses on diverse aspects like AI, digital inclusivity, paperless trade, and more.

  • Incorporation of advanced digital chapters into existing FTAs, e.g., Singapore-Australia FTA and the UK-Singapore FTA.

Voice of Other International Bodies

  • The G7: A significant step in 2021 with the establishment of Digital Trade Principles.

  • Key emphasis on ensuring data flow, privacy, IP rights protection, and combating data localization for protectionist intentions.

  • Noteworthy platforms for future endeavors:

    • Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) on digital standards.

    • Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) Forum.

    • OECD Digital Economy Ministerial Meetings.

    • Bilateral dialogues, including partnerships with India, Japan, and the UK.

In Conclusion


The global digital trade tapestry is intricate and ever-evolving. With each region and major player, from the EU to the US, weaving its unique narrative, it’s pivotal to remain informed and adaptable. This playbook offers a concise yet comprehensive roadmap to navigate this dynamic ecosystem, aiding stakeholders to make informed decisions.


Note: The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

Comments


bottom of page